2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2016.2608323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Secondary Control Policies with Respect to Digital Communications Properties in Inverter-based Islanded Microgrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Note however that the specific effect that communications have in the performance of the analyzed polices has not characterized. The performance evaluation paper [33] focuses on this topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note however that the specific effect that communications have in the performance of the analyzed polices has not characterized. The performance evaluation paper [33] focuses on this topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], conditions for robust non-linear stability of MGs operated with a distributed averaging integral controller under fast-varying time-delays and switching communication topology are derived. Furthermore, various secondary frequency control policies are compared in [13]. In particular, the effects of communication properties on different strategies, such as, centralized, decentralized, averaging and consensus strategies, are analysed in a quantitative way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fast nature of MG secondary control makes them more prone to communication weaknesses compared to conventional secondary controls on larger power systems. Several recent works have assessed the robustness of MGs secondary control methods against time delays [56][57][58][59][60], using random modelling of the delays for centralized control [56] or Markov chains modelling of the delays for distributed secondary control [57]. Most of these studies focus on frequency and voltage regulation controllers, however optimal energy management controls on the secondary levels can be also affected by communication delays [58].…”
Section: Secondary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%