2012
DOI: 10.2175/106143011x13233670703611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Sequencing Batch Reactor for Beverage Industrial Wastewater Treatment

Abstract: Attempts were made in this study to examine the effectiveness of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for the treatment of beverage industrial wastewater. The SBR was operated at three different organic loading rates (OLRs): 2, 1.7 and 1.1 kg COD/m 3 d. Results of continuous long-term operation showed that by decreasing OLR from 2 to 1.7 kg COD/m 3 day, the removal efficiency was increased from 95.5 to 99.3% for COD, from 95.3 to 98.1% for BOD and from 87 to 97.7% for TSS. While further decreasing of the OLR to 1.1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the b value predicted was slightly higher than other b values found in biofiltration systems (Alonso et al, 2000). However, they are lower than results commonly found in other biological treatment systems (Akhbari et al, 2012;El-Kamah and Mahmoud, 2012;Emerald et al, 2012). This last fact was actually expented since biofiltration technology is a fixed biomass system.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In addition, the b value predicted was slightly higher than other b values found in biofiltration systems (Alonso et al, 2000). However, they are lower than results commonly found in other biological treatment systems (Akhbari et al, 2012;El-Kamah and Mahmoud, 2012;Emerald et al, 2012). This last fact was actually expented since biofiltration technology is a fixed biomass system.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Good performance and high efficiency at low cost, simplicity, efficient quality control in the effluent and flexibility of use and high biogas yield. The disadvantages are It is very slow process require several weeks, concentration gradients appear inside the systems, granulation process is difficult to control, and it requires proper monitoring to maintain the alkalinity to balance the excessive acidity (Suresh, Tripathi, and Gernal 2011;El-Kamah and Mahmoud (2012); Singh and Srivastava (2011); Fito, Tefera, and Van Hulle (2019b); Van Lier et al, (2001); Ghangrekar, Joshi, and Asolekar (2003); Lettinga and Hulshoff Pol (1991))…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Biological Remediation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%