2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.11.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of SiPM photodetectors for PET imaging in the presence of magnetic fields

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe multi pixel photon counter (MPPC) or silicon photomultiplier (SiPM), recently introduced as a solid state photodetector, consists of an array of Geiger mode photodiodes (microcells). It is a promising device for PET due to its potential for high photon detection efficiency (PDE) and its foreseeable immunity to magnetic fields. It is also easy to use with simple read outs, has a high gain and a small size. In this work we evaluate the in field performance of three 1 Â 1 mm 2 (with 100, 400 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these solid-state devices are much more compact and essentially transparent to 511 keV gamma rays. This enables novel detector designs aimed at, for example, compactness, high resolution, depth-of-interaction (DOI) correction, etc (España et al 2010, Kolb et al 2008, Llosá et al 2008, Pestotnik et al 2008, Schaart et al 2008b, Song et al 2008. Moreover, in contrast with PMTs, SiPMs are compatible with magnetic fields, a feature that is very interesting in light of recent endeavours to combine PET and MRI into hybrid imaging devices (Catana et al 2006, Shao et al 1997, Townsend 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these solid-state devices are much more compact and essentially transparent to 511 keV gamma rays. This enables novel detector designs aimed at, for example, compactness, high resolution, depth-of-interaction (DOI) correction, etc (España et al 2010, Kolb et al 2008, Llosá et al 2008, Pestotnik et al 2008, Schaart et al 2008b, Song et al 2008. Moreover, in contrast with PMTs, SiPMs are compatible with magnetic fields, a feature that is very interesting in light of recent endeavours to combine PET and MRI into hybrid imaging devices (Catana et al 2006, Shao et al 1997, Townsend 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters such as the rise time and the TTS of the signal, the working temperature of the sensor, the voltage supply thereof, and the amount of received light, have direct influence in the system resolution [2,8]. In the case of the rise time, the faster the rise time the lower the jitter and, thus, it is recommended to obtain values of rise time as low as possible [9,10].…”
Section: Sipms Characterization For Timing Resolution Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some alternatives, the one that has outweighed all of them has been the Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) technology [2]. This new detector approach has come up with the use of SiPMs as a replacement for PSPMTs in order to overcome their limitations and, furthermore, include some advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose a matrix of SiPM [3] is coupled to this crystal array and its signals are connected to an anger logic type of charge divider [4]. These position signals are digitized and the time decay constant of the crystal of interaction determines the crystal of interaction.…”
Section: Guerra M Desco Member Ieeementioning
confidence: 99%