IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2004.1404918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of the flow-based fast handover method for mobile IPv6 network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both ideas are implemented in the mobile IP protocol (MIP) [3][4][5] by using home agents (HAs) and 'binding updates'. Improved solutions, such as hierarchical mobile IP (HMIP) [6], fast handovers in mobile IP (FMIP) [7], and flow-based fast handover for mobile IPv6 (FFHMIPv6) [8], also exist. However, all MIP-based solutions are inefficient in some way, with one or more of the following problems:…”
Section: Handover Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ideas are implemented in the mobile IP protocol (MIP) [3][4][5] by using home agents (HAs) and 'binding updates'. Improved solutions, such as hierarchical mobile IP (HMIP) [6], fast handovers in mobile IP (FMIP) [7], and flow-based fast handover for mobile IPv6 (FFHMIPv6) [8], also exist. However, all MIP-based solutions are inefficient in some way, with one or more of the following problems:…”
Section: Handover Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The handover delay of the original MIP reported in the literature lasts for several 100 milliseconds (ms) to several seconds [7,17,19]. Hsieh et al showed that by combining the extensions, the handover delay can be reduced to around 300 ms [7].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IETF also proposed MIPv6 for mobile users which have increased in recent years [2]. MIPv6 provides transparency in the routing of packets which are sent from correspondent nodes (CNs) to MN while a MN move from one network to another network (handover) by maintaining its home address [2]- [4]. The mobility in the MIPv6 only provides a good performance in the macro areas or non-real-time communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are undesirable packet losses in the micro areas or realtime applications during handover time. These packet losses cause degradation in Quality of Service (QoS) for various applications such as VoIP [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%