2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of weak subgrade soil under increased surcharge weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 12 shows the measured M R values of both soil types plotted against the equation developed by Abubakar [ 14 ], which shows that A-6 soil underestimates and A-2-6 soil overestimates the M R values of subgrade soil.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 12 shows the measured M R values of both soil types plotted against the equation developed by Abubakar [ 14 ], which shows that A-6 soil underestimates and A-2-6 soil overestimates the M R values of subgrade soil.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in industry the use of surcharge weight in CBR testing is not well-defined. The overburden pressure resulting from the weight of the pavement on the soil is simulated using surcharge weight [ 14 ]. Razouki [ 15 ] suggested that a surcharge weight of 2.27 kg is suitable for pavement thicknesses of 63.5 mm, but the weight on CBR mould should not be less than 4.5 kg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations