1994
DOI: 10.1109/68.285571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance implications of component crosstalk in transparent lightwave networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations performed by Buckman are also included for the cases of Gaussian and numerically determined distributions for incoherent crosstalk characteristics. It is evident from figure 6 that the level of crosstalk which may be accomodated is significantly higher for incoherent forms of crosstalk (Goldstein et al, 1994;Buckman et al, 1997;Yang & Yao, 1996;Jeong & Goodman, 1996;). Switch extinction ratio is related to crosstalk at the circuit level.…”
Section: Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculations performed by Buckman are also included for the cases of Gaussian and numerically determined distributions for incoherent crosstalk characteristics. It is evident from figure 6 that the level of crosstalk which may be accomodated is significantly higher for incoherent forms of crosstalk (Goldstein et al, 1994;Buckman et al, 1997;Yang & Yao, 1996;Jeong & Goodman, 1996;). Switch extinction ratio is related to crosstalk at the circuit level.…”
Section: Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If the path length differences are minimised to less than one bit period and the wavelengths are stable, as might be anticipated in a monolithic multistage network, phase difference becomes invariant and less problematic (Dods et al, 1997). Coherent crosstalk can incur an overhead of order 10dB on the crosstalk requirement (Goldstein et al, 1994;Goldstein & Eskildsen, 1995;Eskildsen & Hansen, 1997) and this has led some to suggest a -40dB extinction ratio requirement for telecommunication networks using an optical switch technology (Larsen and Gustavsson, 1997). Figure 6 summarises representative quantifying the role of crosstalk on signal degradation.…”
Section: Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it is easily shown that a closed form expression for U is (4) and the total average transit delay, that is the sum of the propagation delay H and the possible internal queueing delay normalized by the hop propagation delay, is The values of the average number of hops ( H ) and probability of don't care (Pdc) can be obtained considering a probability of cell deflection p = 0 (for this case) and that the random walk of a test cell toward destination is modeled as an absorbing Markov chain whose states are deked by the network nodes, the only absorbing state being the destination node as in 131, [121. (2) and (3), except that in this case p is not conditionedon the buffer being empty, and p is conditioned on the probability that no new cells from the submodule are present for transmission ( 1 -9).…”
Section: Access Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability that one of the buffers is empty (4). is given by 0.l transmission (9) times the probability that both buffers are empty (q2) times the probability that at least one of the two slots is free…”
Section: Access Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation