2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance improvement and comparisons of CO2 based adsorption cooling system using modified cycles employing various adsorbents: A comprehensive study of subcritical and transcritical cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A maximum COP of 0.130 was achieved for ACs carbonized at 500 °C at an evaporator and generator temperature of 15 and 100 °C, respectively. Various other significant properties of these novel activated carbons are reported elsewhere. , Apart from these novel ACs, there are a few other categories of adsorbents, i.e., grades of porous cross-linked organic polymers (DAT-1 and DAT-2), carbon molecular sieves (VR-5 and VR-93), and specific different grades of MOFs (MOF-200), which are comparable and better than the previously reported adsorbents and have the potential to make a mark in the development of next-generation compact ADCS. , In continuation, in our previous works, , a major emphasis is given to improving the system performance using combined heat and mass recovery schemes clubbed with an ejector and thermoelectric subcooler under subcritical and transcritical operations employing various adsorbents. A maximum COP of 0.301 and 0.353 was attained with Maxsorb III and WPT-AC-500 as the adsorbents under subcritical and transcritical operations, respectively, which is the current benchmark for the CO 2 -based ADCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A maximum COP of 0.130 was achieved for ACs carbonized at 500 °C at an evaporator and generator temperature of 15 and 100 °C, respectively. Various other significant properties of these novel activated carbons are reported elsewhere. , Apart from these novel ACs, there are a few other categories of adsorbents, i.e., grades of porous cross-linked organic polymers (DAT-1 and DAT-2), carbon molecular sieves (VR-5 and VR-93), and specific different grades of MOFs (MOF-200), which are comparable and better than the previously reported adsorbents and have the potential to make a mark in the development of next-generation compact ADCS. , In continuation, in our previous works, , a major emphasis is given to improving the system performance using combined heat and mass recovery schemes clubbed with an ejector and thermoelectric subcooler under subcritical and transcritical operations employing various adsorbents. A maximum COP of 0.301 and 0.353 was attained with Maxsorb III and WPT-AC-500 as the adsorbents under subcritical and transcritical operations, respectively, which is the current benchmark for the CO 2 -based ADCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Various heat interactions during adsorption, preheating, desorption, and precooling undergone by the adsorbent bed packed with CSAC are given by Q 1 2 = T ea T sd [ C p normala + c max C p ref false( T false) ] m a d T Q 2 2 = T sd T ed [ C p a + c false( T , P false) C p ref false( T false) + Q st c T …”
Section: Thermodynamic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of a four‐bed CO 2 VARS with Maxsorb III as adsorbent material is theoretically investigated by Jribi et al 17 and observed the cooling output of 2 kW with a COP of 0.1. An interesting study is carried out by Gautam and Sahoo 18 in the performance investigation of CO 2 VARS with four combinations of heat and mass recovery for five different adsorbents. The study is carried out for (a) normal cycle, (b) with heat recovery, (c) with mass recovery, and (d) with heat‐ mass recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%