2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance improvement of an NCS closed over the internet with an adaptive Smith Predictor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let r 1 (t) be the original signal (10) for i � 2: n do (11) repeat ( 12) Obtain e i and f i by means of cubic spline fitting of all maximum and minimum points (13)…”
Section: Parameter Optimization Based On Aqpso Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let r 1 (t) be the original signal (10) for i � 2: n do (11) repeat ( 12) Obtain e i and f i by means of cubic spline fitting of all maximum and minimum points (13)…”
Section: Parameter Optimization Based On Aqpso Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the process of solving the model parameters is too complex, so it is not suitable for the case with a large range of network delay fluctuation. With the introduction of compensation devices in the feedback loop, Smith predictor can eliminate the adverse effect of network delay on the control system [12,13]. But in practical application, when the parameters of the controlled system are unstable or disturbed, the Smith prediction model will get out of control, which leads to the control effect getting worse and even oscillating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It extends the small gain theorem (SGT) for feedback loops with variable time delays. Surprisingly, stability is not always explicitly considered as, e.g., in [9], where an adaptive Smith predictor is applied to control an optical oven over the internet that is subject to variable time delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing position servo control methods rarely consider the impact of the network-induced delays. In the field of networked control systems, there are many network-induced delay compensation methods [21][22][23][24][25][26], such as the adaptive Smith predictors, switching system methods, and so on, but most of the algorithms are complex and difficult to apply in practice. Recently, a novel method termed the communication disturbance observer (CDOB) was presented in [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%