Performance mapping in two-step cluster analysis through ESEG disclosures and EPS

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this work is twofold. First, looks to identify the main homogenous groups of companies after environmental, social, economic and governance (ESEG) disclosures, non-financial statement and earnings per share (EPS), and second investigates the connection between variables.Design/methodology/approachUsing financial and non-financial information from annual reports of private listed companies, the authors performed two-step cluster analysis (TSCA) in the first stage of the research, followed by parametric, nonparametric correlation analysis, as well as regression analysis based on panel data, in the second stage.FindingsResults of TSCA revealed a cluster of companies with good financial and non-financial outcomes and a cluster of companies with poor performance. The performance dynamics showed a slight improvement during the period for few companies and composition analysis of clusters by industries through Kruskal–Wallis test highlighted differences between clusters, only for 2017. The main findings confirm a direct, although weak in intensity but statistically significant correlation between ESEG disclosure index, its sustainability component and financial performance (FP), valid for the entire period. Also, the results showed a direct link of low intensity to average, but statistically significant between the non-financial statement and EPS, valid only for 2017 and 2018.Research limitations/implicationsThe results indicate mixed findings which invites further in-depth research. Limits of the study can be found in selected indicators and the short period of time analyzed. However, the practical implications are worth considering from the perspective of finding new managerial tools that can better shape the relationship between ESEG disclosures and FP.Practical implicationsESEG Dindx can be an instrument for managers that can optimize the link between the FP of companies and its sustainable development.Social implicationsESEG Dindx measures the disclosure degree of ESEG information by the companies listed on Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE). The main findings of the work confirm a direct, although weak in intensity but statistically significant correlation between ESEG disclosure index, its sustainability component and FP, valid for the entire period.Originality/valueThis study adds value to the existing literature by the proposed research framework, design of ESEG Dindx and the way correlations between variables were investigated.

Sectoral Performance Trends and Differences in the Balkan and Eastern European Region

“…In order to handle both continuous and categorical variables, this study used two-step cluster analysis (TSCA) (Rundle-Thiele et al 2015). TSCA is widely used to find patterns in a set of input variables by clustering records so that those in one group are more likely to be similar to one another than those in other groups (Popa et al 2022). The two processes are pre-clustering and clustering, in that order.…”

The impact of green innovation on sustainability and financial performance: Evidence from the Jordanian financial sector

“…Tobin's Q, on the other hand, is determined as the ratio of the sum of the market value of equity and total book value of liabilities to total book value of assets (Albertini, 2013). Popa et al (2022) and Zhou et al (2022) established the continuous relationship between FP and environmental, social, and governance as sustainability indicators disclosure index components, albeit with low statistical significance. Accounting for innovation implementation helps managers to identify products with elevated social and environmental costs, which in turn facilitates the evaluation of business FP (Al‐Okaily, 2021, 2022, 2023; Abd Rahman et al, 2020; Al‐Okaily &, 2022; Nnamani et al, 2017).…”

Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0: can clusters deal with the challenges? (A systemic approach)

“…However, in this difficult and uncertain situation, some researchers tried to continue the study of Industry 4.0 and clusters jointly. Research was carried out theoretically (Batz et al, 2018;G€ otz, 2019a;Herrmann et al, 2021;Popa et al, 2022) as well as on cases of specific successful clusters (G€ otz, 2019b; Grashof et al, 2021;Gudelite, 2021;Jankowska et al, 2021).…”

“…Research was carried out theoretically (Batz et al. , 2018; Götz, 2019a; Herrmann et al., 2021; Popa et al. , 2022) as well as on cases of specific successful clusters (Götz, 2019b; Grashof et al.…”