2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-2373(99)00074-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance measurement at Nordic companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
107
2
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
107
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Using another type of clustering, for example geographical clustering, the HMH countries are all from Western Europe but not all Western European countries have high moral hazard. Northern European companies are considered as well developed in terms of performance measures (Kald and Nilsson 2000); in our analysis they are distributed across all three clusters: Sweden, Norway, Lithuania, Finland and Denmark in the LMH cluster, Latvia in the MMH and Iceland in the HMH. Again, prior expectations about moral hazard behaviour are not totally consistent with previous clustering studies.…”
Section: Does the Pattern Differ Across Europe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using another type of clustering, for example geographical clustering, the HMH countries are all from Western Europe but not all Western European countries have high moral hazard. Northern European companies are considered as well developed in terms of performance measures (Kald and Nilsson 2000); in our analysis they are distributed across all three clusters: Sweden, Norway, Lithuania, Finland and Denmark in the LMH cluster, Latvia in the MMH and Iceland in the HMH. Again, prior expectations about moral hazard behaviour are not totally consistent with previous clustering studies.…”
Section: Does the Pattern Differ Across Europe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…roles that SPMS may play in organisational life is far broader (Atkinson et al, 1997;Micheli and Manzoni, 2010;Tayler, 2010;Wiersma, 2009) and include supporting the bottom-up development of innovative initiatives and unanticipated emergent strategies (Bisbe and Otley, 2004;Henri, 2006;Simons, 1995;Tuomela, 2005;Widener, 2007); as well as assisting in the revision or (re)formulation of intended strategies (Bourne et al, 2000;Campbell et al, 2008, Gimbert et al, 2010Kald and Nilsson, 2000;Kaplan and Norton, 2008). In this paper, we specifically focus on this latter role and investigate whether the plausible relationship that exists between SPMS and organisational performance is accounted for, at least in part, by variables related to the processes of (re)formulating intended strategies.…”
Section: Spms Performance and Strategy (Re)formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of major Swedish companies found that 27% of those included had already implemented the BSC (Kald and Nilsson, 2000). If we include the companies that say they expect to have the BSC within two years, the share rises to 61%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%