2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cscloud.2015.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Metrics of Local Cloud Computing Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Local Cloud is administered by internal or external sources explicitly intended for a group or institution [17]. Local cloud is deployed in a local network that coordinates with its remote cloud server to promote data privacy.…”
Section: Related Concepts and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Local Cloud is administered by internal or external sources explicitly intended for a group or institution [17]. Local cloud is deployed in a local network that coordinates with its remote cloud server to promote data privacy.…”
Section: Related Concepts and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central processing unit (CPU) utilization is used as a valuable metric for software performance evaluation in conjunction with other metrics, such as memory and network utilization. In recent years, this metric has become a benchmark for assessing the performance of cloud computing and distributed systems [51][52][53][54][55]. Measuring the CPU utilization metric is crucial for efficiently estimating the processing power required by XR applications hosted on the Holo-Cloud.…”
Section: Processor Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some articles investigated benchmarking systems at design-time, i.e., performance metrics that can be calculated before the sourcecode is written. Finally, the type 'analytical and measurement' Metric type Articles Performance (de Souza Pinto et al 2018) (van Eyk et al 2018) (Shukla et al 2017) (Aragon et al 2019) (Bermbach et al 2017) (Bondi 2016) (Martinez-Millana et al 2015) (Tekli et al 2011) (Vasar et al 2012) (Franks et al 2011) (Gesvindr & Buhnova 2019) (Ibrahim et al 2018) (Pandey et al 2017) (Ferreira et al 2016) (Ueda et al 2016) (Hadjilambrou et al 2015) (Amaral et al 2015) (Brummett et al 2015 Table 1 Selected articles in the systematic literature review.…”
Section: Benchmark In Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%