2017 9th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icumt.2017.8255161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance modeling of networked control systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Our distributed control functionalities are belonging to Layer 7 which can, in principle, be placed on top of any of the above layers as, e.g., a pure hardware solution directly across wires of the PHY Layer 1 for signal transmissions as in classical electrical control systems, the MAC Layer 2a of shared LANs for frame exchanges, the Link Layer 2b for safe exchange of frames as in our paper [14,15], the Network Layer 3 for an unreliable end-to-end exchange of packets (but with enhanced transport options), or the Transport Layer 4 for a safe exchange of byte streams endto-end. The functional support increases in the upward direction but the end-to-end delays increase accordingly.…”
Section: Architectural Alternatives For Ncssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1. Our distributed control functionalities are belonging to Layer 7 which can, in principle, be placed on top of any of the above layers as, e.g., a pure hardware solution directly across wires of the PHY Layer 1 for signal transmissions as in classical electrical control systems, the MAC Layer 2a of shared LANs for frame exchanges, the Link Layer 2b for safe exchange of frames as in our paper [14,15], the Network Layer 3 for an unreliable end-to-end exchange of packets (but with enhanced transport options), or the Transport Layer 4 for a safe exchange of byte streams endto-end. The functional support increases in the upward direction but the end-to-end delays increase accordingly.…”
Section: Architectural Alternatives For Ncssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of Fig. 4 has been analyzed before [14] with a dedicated network infrastructure where the "Network" is a two-way logical link control (LLC) connection (Layer 2b) operated under control of the "Send-and-Wait" or under the "Selected Repeat" protocol with Timeout recovery in case of frame loss or excessive frame delay between A and C and between C and A separately. In this contribution we extend the model to a NCS with a shared network infrastructure, i.e., a local area network operated on layers 1 (Physical Layer) and 2a (Media Access Control Layer) by a wiredor a wireless network.…”
Section: Closed-loop Ncs Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations