2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2008.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance modeling of parallel applications for grid scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also show that the predicted execution times shown in Figure 7(b) are highly accurate and are within 10-30% of the actual execution times shown in Figure 7(a). This confirms the conclusions in our previous work [45] regarding the accuracy of the performance models. We also find that the relative differences between the predicted execution times of the schedules for the different algorithms, as shown in Figure 7(b), match the relative differences between the actual execution times shown in Figure 7(a).…”
Section: Real Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results also show that the predicted execution times shown in Figure 7(b) are highly accurate and are within 10-30% of the actual execution times shown in Figure 7(a). This confirms the conclusions in our previous work [45] regarding the accuracy of the performance models. We also find that the relative differences between the predicted execution times of the schedules for the different algorithms, as shown in Figure 7(b), match the relative differences between the actual execution times shown in Figure 7(a).…”
Section: Real Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our previous work [45], we developed performance modeling strategies for predicting the execution times of tightly coupled parallel applications on non-dedicated homogeneous resources. We calculated the time taken for the execution of a parallel application as: The formula shown in Equation (1) splits the execution time of a parallel application into two parts, f comp and f comm , for representing computation and communication aspects, respectively, of the parallel application.…”
Section: Application Performance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Code analysis (Nudd et al, 2000;Reistad and Gifford, 1994) • Analytic benchmarking/code profiling (Yang et al, 1993) • Historical/Statistical prediction (Sanjay and Vadhiyar, 2008;Iverson et al, 1996) • Empirical analysis (Berman et al, 2005) Using these solutions, or by executing part of the code, other information related to user jobs can be obtained. In addition, there exists many studies which proposed models to estimate specific parameters (e.g., Cycle Per Instruction (CPI) (Chen and John, 2011;Intel Corporation, 2008), Memory Access Per Instruction (MPI) (Zhang and Chang, 2014) and estimated bandwidth (Zhu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Profiling and Prediction Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emulation demonstrates the conditions for which, splitting a TCP connection is most useful and reveals a significant source of overhead. In [19], Sanjay et al developed a comprehensive set of performance modeling strategies for predicting execution times of parallel applications on both dedicated and non-dedicated environments. These strategies adapt to changing network and CPU loads on the grid resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%