2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of 3 real-time PCR assays for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA from clinical samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional detection method of S. aureus was based on microbial culturing, followed by biochemical identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Molecular biological assays for S. aureus like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ( 27 ), real-time PCR ( 28 ) and Multiplex real-time PCR ( 29 ) are commonly used. In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ( 30 ) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) ( 31 ) are also used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional detection method of S. aureus was based on microbial culturing, followed by biochemical identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Molecular biological assays for S. aureus like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ( 27 ), real-time PCR ( 28 ) and Multiplex real-time PCR ( 29 ) are commonly used. In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ( 30 ) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) ( 31 ) are also used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional bacterial culture method for the detection of S. aureus, although inexpensive and commonly used in resource-limited settings, the method is time-consuming and not able to meet the requirements of rapid detection [6]. PCR method, although highly sensitive, but the instrument is expensive and sophisticated, requires highly qualified personnel to operate, and is difficult to popularize [7]. The traditional ELISA method for the detection of S. aureus is characterized by low chemical stability, high cost, and difficulty in recycling [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) are also used in S. aureus detection; beyond the present low limit of detection (LoD), they are more expensive and require more qualified professionals to operate. , Not even the PCR, ELISA, or bacterial culture matches the prerequisites for a rapid test . The detection of S.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%