Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study was to compare the performance of two different COMPlog computerised, single letter scoring, visual acuity (VA) measurements against gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart measurements in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). One computerised algorithm presented five and the other presented three letters per line; both computerised algorithms utilised half, rather than the full-letter width spacing standard on ETDRS charts that might induce crowding, fixation problems, increased test-retest variability (TRV), and bias. Methods Fifty patients with AMD (mean age 83 years) underwent timed test and retest VA measurements using ETDRS charts and COMPlog five (C5) and three (C3) letters per line computerised VA measurement algorithms. All tests utilised single-letter scoring methodology. Bland and Altman methods were employed. Performance was measured in terms of bias, TRV, and test time.Results The C5 and C3 scores showed no bias compared with the ETDRS chart measurements. C5 measurements had equal TRV to the ETDRS chart (±0.13 logMAR) with similar median test times (105 and 96 s, respectively). C3 measurements were slightly more variable (TRV ± 0.17 logMAR), but 30 s quicker than ETDRS chart measurements. Conclusions The closer letter spacing employed in COMPlog testing algorithms appears to have no adverse effect on VA measurements compared with the gold standard ETDRS chart in patients with AMD. The three letter per line testing algorithm facilitates faster testing but with a two letter increase in TRV.

Validation of an automated‐ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement

“…With advances in technology, automated visual acuity tests using electronic devices have been developed and studied. [8][9][10][11] The advantages of automated visual acuity testing over paper chart testing include use of a standardised protocol, reduced risk of patients memorising the letters, and limiting human error in counting letters and calculating visual acuity. Thus, many clinical trials use automated visual acuity testing as the gold standard to measure treatment outcomes.…”

Contrast Sensitivity and Lateral Inhibition Are Enhanced With Macular Carotenoid Supplementation

“…G iven that it confers the ability to make objects visually distinguishable, 1 contrast sensitivity (CS) is perhaps the most important aspect of visual function. There are several factors that affect CS, including age, 2,3 ocular health, 4 fatigue, 5 and neurological disease, such as Alzheimer's. 6 Recently, the role of diet in visual performance has become evident.…”

Atropine Penalization Versus Occlusion Therapies for Unilateral Amblyopia after the Critical Period of Visual Development: A Systematic Review

“…Visual acuity is measured using a variety of visual acuity testing protocols. Of these, the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy vision test (ETDRS) is considered to be the gold standard of visual acuity assessment [ 22 ], and the ETDRS values were used in this review.…”