1992
DOI: 10.1016/0963-8695(92)90252-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a CT imaging system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the sample spacing should be set fine enough to avoid aliasing, all available fine detail will be reproduced and the spatial resolution will be limited by other factors [5][6][7]. The most elemental of these are two factors related to properties of the x-ray beam itself: the profile of the beam between the x-ray focal spot and the detector, and the position of the object being scanned in relation to the focal spot and detector.…”
Section: De1ermining Maximum Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the sample spacing should be set fine enough to avoid aliasing, all available fine detail will be reproduced and the spatial resolution will be limited by other factors [5][6][7]. The most elemental of these are two factors related to properties of the x-ray beam itself: the profile of the beam between the x-ray focal spot and the detector, and the position of the object being scanned in relation to the focal spot and detector.…”
Section: De1ermining Maximum Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%