2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a fungal monolith bioreactor for the removal of styrene from polluted air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High elimination capacity was achieved under large substrate load. Similar results have been obtained in other research on odor removal (Rene et al, 2010;Zilli et al, 2001). In addition, higher concentrations of substrates will be treated more effectively under many conditions because it will drive the contaminant into the biofilm more rapidly and speed biodegradation, especially in a case of diffusion limitation.…”
Section: H 2 S Removal In the Biofilter Bedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…High elimination capacity was achieved under large substrate load. Similar results have been obtained in other research on odor removal (Rene et al, 2010;Zilli et al, 2001). In addition, higher concentrations of substrates will be treated more effectively under many conditions because it will drive the contaminant into the biofilm more rapidly and speed biodegradation, especially in a case of diffusion limitation.…”
Section: H 2 S Removal In the Biofilter Bedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5c), respectively. These values are comparable to the ratio of 2.78 g CO 2 /g styrene reported by Rene et al (2010) by using a fungal monolith bioreactor. (Fig.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide Productionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Hence, another method employed for monitoring biotrickling filter performance and acquiring information on the extent of mineralization is based on the measurement of CO 2 concentrations in the inlet and outlet air streams. For this purpose, the CO 2 production rate was calculated and the results are shown in Figure 5 illustrating a linear relationship between CO 2 production rate and elimination capacity, confirming previous observations [28]. If all carbon coming from butanol degradation was mineralized to CO 2 , the slope observed on such a plot should be approximately 2.38 since for every mole of butanol degraded (74 g), 4 moles (176 g) of CO 2 would be produced, according to stoichiometry.…”
Section: Co 2 Productionsupporting
confidence: 85%