2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(99)00133-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a low cost solar paraboloidal dish steam generating system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat loss rate from the lower part of the receiver tube which is not insulated, due to the external forced convection of wind [5] …”
Section: Solar Receiver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heat loss rate from the lower part of the receiver tube which is not insulated, due to the external forced convection of wind [5] …”
Section: Solar Receiver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sendhil Kumar and Reddy [4] compared different types of cavity receivers numerically and suggested that the modified cavity receiver may be preferred in a solar dish collector system. The total heat loss rate from the modified cavity receiver due to convection, radiation and conduction, is a function of the receiver geometry [5]. A numerical investigation of natural convection heat loss [6], an inclusion of the contribution of radiation losses [7] and an improved model for natural convection heat loss [8] was presented for the modified cavity receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test results from this model shows temperature above 200 •C on average sunny and cloud free day. N.D Kaushika and K.S Reddy [8] present the design and performance characteristics of a low cost solar steam generating system which incorporates recent design of parabolic dish technology. Preliminary field measurements and cost, as well as performance analyses of the system, indicate a solar to steam conversion efficiency of 70±80% at 4508C and a collector system cost of Rs 8000±9000/m2 (US$1=Rs, 40.0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harris & Lenz (1985) found the thermal and optical losses from a cavity solar receiver were less than other types of receiver. Kaushika and Reddy (2000) designed the modified cavity receiver to perform minimum heat loss from the receiver with www.intechopen.com Heat Transfer Performances and Exergetic Optimization for Solar Heat Receiver 305 fuzzy focal dish concentrators. Steinfeld & Schubnell (1993) investigated the solar cavity receiver, and educed the optimum aperture size and operating temperature by a semi empirical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%