2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ref.2022.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a new hybrid approach for detection of islanding for inverter-based DGs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the gain of the positive feedback can degrade inverter stability. One form of overcoming this issue is through the bilateral variation of ancillaries parameters, as exposed in [132] or by the adoption of adaptive gains with [174]- [169] or without machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the gain of the positive feedback can degrade inverter stability. One form of overcoming this issue is through the bilateral variation of ancillaries parameters, as exposed in [132] or by the adoption of adaptive gains with [174]- [169] or without machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [169], is proposed a hybrid method in which the SFS perturbation is activated by the reactive power monitoring. More than that, it uses the Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization (APSO) in order to calculate the optimum value of the gain K to guarantee correct islanding detection with minimum THDi and to mitigate the stability impacts.…”
Section: ) Sfs Based Hybrid Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the approach demonstrated strong performance in multi-DG contexts and weak grid situations, with the ability to differentiate between IS and non-IS eventualities. A hybrid approach is presented in 161 , wherein reactive power monitoring triggers the SFS disturbance. Furthermore, it makes use of APSO to determine the ideal gain K value to minimize stability implications and ensure accurate IS identification with the lowest possible THDi.…”
Section: Islanding Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they extract features from the signal and use them as input for judgment, these classifiers do away with the difficulty of setting detection thresholds. It is noteworthy that certain active approaches, such as those covered in 124 , 161 , use ML and its algorithms. Though they don't directly affect the IS decision, they are left out of this part because the main goal of using ML is to dynamically parameterize the techniques.…”
Section: Islanding Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%