2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-018-6008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a Partial Discrete Wavelet Transform Based Path Merging Compression Technique for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed the advantages and success of our proposed algorithm with experimental study. Since we used statistical approaches in distributed environment simulation, our study has been more successful than other studies [6,7]. Moreover, unlike previous studies [4,8], data confidentiality and data consistency were realized simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We showed the advantages and success of our proposed algorithm with experimental study. Since we used statistical approaches in distributed environment simulation, our study has been more successful than other studies [6,7]. Moreover, unlike previous studies [4,8], data confidentiality and data consistency were realized simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Processing and transmitting massive superfluous data can lead to additional power consumption and greatly decrease network lifetime [15,16]. To improve data processing performance, a path merging protocol, which supports partial discrete wavelet transform-based compression schemes to reduce redundant data transmission in a significant manner through the appropriate aggregation of data packets from merging paths, was proposed in [17]. To manage energy-efficient data collections in WSNs, a dataaware energy conservation scheme and prediction-based data collection framework were proposed to reduce data transmission [18], where the inherent correlation between the consecutive observations of SNs and the data similarity measures between the neighboring SNs are utilized.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closer to the base station will be considered as cluster head and farer to the base station will not be considered as cluster head. The probability of the nodes becoming Cluster Head is accumulated by a weighted value which is determined by distance between the nodes and the base station [12][13][14] (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Distance-based Cluster Head Election Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%