1972
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1972.1140304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a protruding-dielectric waveguide element in a phased array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with the experimental evidence [31] collected for plane arrays, where the notches in the element pattern due to bound waves are always more pronounced than the notches due to grating lobe effects.…”
Section: Unclassifiedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are in agreement with the experimental evidence [31] collected for plane arrays, where the notches in the element pattern due to bound waves are always more pronounced than the notches due to grating lobe effects.…”
Section: Unclassifiedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The problem is 2-D (independent of the -coordinate) and the fields are taken to be to simulate -plane scan conditions. This commonly used 2-D analog possesses the most important physical attributes of the more practical 3-D problem [3]. Moreover, the 2-D formulation is algebraically simpler and, therefore, permits a clearer presentation of its analytical and numerical properties.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest here are efforts to address the matching problem by including dielectric inserts-protrusions in the waveguide-to-free-space transition region. Among them is the early analytical work by Lewis et al [2], [3] on protruding dielectric slabs. In the Russian literature, analogous contemporaneous developments are cited in the paper by Skobelev et al [4], which presents a numerical method for dealing with shaped protruding dielectric elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the voltage and current equations, (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and , respectively, take the form…”
Section: >0mentioning
confidence: 99%