1999
DOI: 10.1002/ep.670180213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of an industrial source complex model: Predicting long‐term concentrations in an urban area

Abstract: The short -t e rm and long-term versions of Industrial Source Complex Models (ISCST3 and ISCLT3) are evaluated for estimating long-term c o n c e n t rations using sulfur dioxide data from emission inve n t o ry of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used different algorithms to calculate exposures from predominantly aerial-and ground-based applications (Brody et al 2002). For aerial applications, which were used for tree pests and cranberry bogs, we used local climate data, the Spray Drift Task Force AgDRIFT model (Teske et al 1997), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Industrial Source Complex Short-Term (ISCT3) air model (Kumar et al 1999; U.S. EPA 1995) to develop the following algorithm:…”
Section: ; Massachusetts Executive Office Of Environmental Affairs 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used different algorithms to calculate exposures from predominantly aerial-and ground-based applications (Brody et al 2002). For aerial applications, which were used for tree pests and cranberry bogs, we used local climate data, the Spray Drift Task Force AgDRIFT model (Teske et al 1997), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Industrial Source Complex Short-Term (ISCT3) air model (Kumar et al 1999; U.S. EPA 1995) to develop the following algorithm:…”
Section: ; Massachusetts Executive Office Of Environmental Affairs 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three parameters below are also introduced to assess the forecast performance of air quality models (e.g. Kumar et al 1999). …”
Section: Model Evaluations Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kumar et al [41] has used statistical tools to evaluate the prediction of lower flammability distances. Patel and Kumar [42], Kumar et al [43], and Kumar et al [44] have indicated that Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Factor of Two (Fa2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Fractional Bias (FB), and Normalized Mean Square Error (NMSE) are important parameters to assess the performance of air-quality models. Here, we re-visit these parameters for the purpose of comparison with typically used ANN measures (section 4.2).…”
Section: Other Comparative Error Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%