2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of API Staph ID 32 and Staph-Zym for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
71
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
71
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of this error could be due to storage error or loss of the initial organism during the recovery and subculturing of the isolates. Some of the error is also likely due to misclassification reported to occur with phenotypic species identification, as such methods can lead to a higher number of unidentified or misidentified staphylococcal isolates (27). When using phenotypic methods, S. chromogenes can be misidentified as S. hyicus (28), as was seen with 8/18 (44%) of the misclassified isolates in this study.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Some of this error could be due to storage error or loss of the initial organism during the recovery and subculturing of the isolates. Some of the error is also likely due to misclassification reported to occur with phenotypic species identification, as such methods can lead to a higher number of unidentified or misidentified staphylococcal isolates (27). When using phenotypic methods, S. chromogenes can be misidentified as S. hyicus (28), as was seen with 8/18 (44%) of the misclassified isolates in this study.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Nevertheless, Sampimona et al (2009) indicated that conventional methods such as the API Staph ID 32 and the Staph-Zym had a high number of unidentified or misidentified CNS strains. Both tests were inadequate to identify CNS isolates from mastitis milk samples.…”
Section: Ajmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apiweb software (bioMerieux) was used to determine the probability of species identification. Identification with a probability ≥ 90% was considered acceptable (Taponen et al 2006, Sampimon et al 2009b. Isolates for which the reliability of identification was <90% were then subjected to analysis with the VITEK GPI card system (VITEK 2 instrument, version 4.01, bioMérieux).…”
Section: Bacterial Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%