2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13214192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of BDS-2/3, GPS, and Galileo Time Transfer with Real-Time Single-Frequency Precise Point Positioning

Abstract: Single-frequency (SF) receivers are much cheaper than that of dual-frequency (DF). Even though DF precise point positioning (PPP) is nowadays applied in the time community, the cost of equipment is one of the key considerations for time users. Furthermore, the hardware delay calibration of single-frequency devices is simpler than that of dual-frequency devices. In addition, there is no literature to study real-time SF PPP time transfer. In this contribution, the possibility of time transfer using SF PPP was st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With global coverage and excellent accuracy, global navigation satellite system (GNSS) has been widely used in daily life [1]. The single-frequency (SF) receiver, which is simple to operate and low-cost, is especially popular with scientific and engineering fields such as time transfer [2], atmospheric delay inversion [3], and differential code bias solution [4]. With abundant research on SF precise point positioning (PPP) observation model refinement [5], ionospheric delay enhancement [6], and performance evaluation with different types of antennas [7], the models and theories of SF-PPP are becoming more mature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With global coverage and excellent accuracy, global navigation satellite system (GNSS) has been widely used in daily life [1]. The single-frequency (SF) receiver, which is simple to operate and low-cost, is especially popular with scientific and engineering fields such as time transfer [2], atmospheric delay inversion [3], and differential code bias solution [4]. With abundant research on SF precise point positioning (PPP) observation model refinement [5], ionospheric delay enhancement [6], and performance evaluation with different types of antennas [7], the models and theories of SF-PPP are becoming more mature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefited from real-time products from IGS ACs, scholars have carried out extensive research on RTPPP time transfer. Research shows that based on GPS/BDS-3, the accuracy of RTPPP time transfer can reach sub-nanosecond level [11,13,14]. Compared with IGS final precise products, using real-time products from CNES, the accuracy of RTPPP time transfer of multi-GNSS (GPS + GLONASS + Galileo) can reach within 0.1 ns, and the performance by multi-GNSS can be improved above 10.7%, 37.6% and 19.4%, compared with GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, respectively [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study revealed that the peak-to-peak value of time transfer error is less than 1 nanosecond, and the frequency stability of time transfer reaching 1 × 10 −16 [6]. Xiao et al studied the feasibility of single-frequency PPP time transfer method and concluded that it can meet sub-nanoseconds time transfer accuracy requirements [7]. Zhang et al confirmed that the Beidou PPP time transfer accuracy can reach nanoseconds or sub-nanoseconds precision, with the daily stability at the 1 × 10 −15 order of magnitude [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%