2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of braced excavation in residual soil with groundwater drawdown

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to some settlement markers being located further away from the wall or on buildings that has more solid foundation, a big range of δ vm /H is observed. Zhang et al [26] reported a quite similar experience to the present study, where δ vm /H was 0.9% and attributed the large ground surface settlements to significant groundwater drawdown.…”
Section: Specific Observations Along Walls E and Fsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to some settlement markers being located further away from the wall or on buildings that has more solid foundation, a big range of δ vm /H is observed. Zhang et al [26] reported a quite similar experience to the present study, where δ vm /H was 0.9% and attributed the large ground surface settlements to significant groundwater drawdown.…”
Section: Specific Observations Along Walls E and Fsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Ignoring these values, the maximum δ vm /δ hm ratio will be 6, still significantly larger than the typical value of 0.5-1.0. Zhang et al [26] reported δ vm /δ hm of 10 and attributed the excessive ground surface settlements to significant groundwater drawdown due to under-drainage mechanism. Therefore, drawing upon the data from the water standpipes at the cut-and-cover tunnel, it is deduced that groundwater drawdown, caused by ground anchor installation that punctured the wall, has led to significant settlement.…”
Section: Relationship Between Maximum Wall Deflections and Maximum Settlementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as groundwater levels, are primary terms that can remarkably alter the soil-pile responses to heavy external loadings. As an example, saturating the soil can cause soil shear strength reduction, which will influence the pile settlement as well as reducing the pile bearing capacities [48]. Another critical issue that can increase the complexity of soil-pile reactions, as well as load-settlement responses, as highlighted by Chisari et al [49].…”
Section: Pile Movement Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a joint in a D-wall does contain defects, leakage may occur. If the excavation is below the groundwater table, there is the possibility that water inrush and piping may occur during excavation, resulting in land subsidence and even disaster [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Furthermore, the bearing capacity of the foundation will decrease with the inrush of groundwater into the excavation zone [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%