2011
DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.377-387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of ceilings in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake

Abstract: This paper describes the performance of (or damage to) ceilings in buildings during the 22nd February 2011 Christchurch earthquake and the subsequent aftershocks. In buildings that suffered severe structural damage, ceilings and other non-structural components (rather expectedly) failed, but even in buildings with little damage to their structural systems, ceilings were found to be severely damaged. The extent of ceiling damage, where the ceilings were subject to severe shaking, depended on the type of the cei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tall buildings due to the nature of the event suffered both structural and non-structural damage but in lowrise structures the damage was in most cases non-structural while the structure remained intact. Among these nonstructural elements, ceilings were conspicuous as the most severely damaged NSEs according to Dhakal et al [29]. Similar forms of damage in suspended ceilings were observed in this earthquake compared to 2010 Darfield earthquake.…”
Section: Seismic Performancesupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Tall buildings due to the nature of the event suffered both structural and non-structural damage but in lowrise structures the damage was in most cases non-structural while the structure remained intact. Among these nonstructural elements, ceilings were conspicuous as the most severely damaged NSEs according to Dhakal et al [29]. Similar forms of damage in suspended ceilings were observed in this earthquake compared to 2010 Darfield earthquake.…”
Section: Seismic Performancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Based on NZS 1170.5:2004 [17], suspended ceilings are mainly designed for serviceability limit state (SLS) unless they are located in buildings of high post-disaster significance such as hospitals and police stations or in case they cover egress areas. However, the performance of suspended ceilings in recent seismic events has proven that damage to suspended ceilings can pose a life threat and cause considerable financial loss [3,29].…”
Section: Current Design/installation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the perimetres, the ceiling is either fixed to the structure via rivets and clips or free to slide on perimetre angles. These ceilings are very common in commercial buildings and they suffered extensive damage during the 2010 -2011 Canterbury earthquakes [26][27][28]. Damage to the ceilings can be the result of components reaching their load carrying capacity.…”
Section: Section I: Suspended Ceilingsmentioning
confidence: 99%