2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0886-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders on the Dimension-Change Card Sort Task

Abstract: Restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders have been conceptualized to reflect impaired executive functions. In the present study, we investigated the performance of 6–17-year-old children with and without an autism spectrum disorder on a dimension-change card sort task that explicitly indicated sorting rules on every trial. Diagnostic groups did not differ in speed of responses after the first rule switch or in speed or accuracy on blocks with mixed versus single sort rules. However, per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
40
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with previous findings [31,32] . Our result might suggest that cognitive flexibility measured by the WCST does not reflect social adaptation in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This result is consistent with previous findings [31,32] . Our result might suggest that cognitive flexibility measured by the WCST does not reflect social adaptation in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Specifically, ASD participants showed slower RT overall on the Detection and Identification tasks with medium effect sizes; after controlling for these effects, the ASD and NT groups did not show differing RT on either the Navon or visual search tasks, nor did the difference in RT between shift and nonshift trials differ between the groups on either task. This is consistent with previous findings that on some measures of executive attention or set shifting, those with ASD do not show impaired performance as compared to NT (Corbett et al, 2009;Dichter et al, 2010;Hayward et al, 2012;Poljac et al, 2010;Stahl & Pry, 2002). The lack of group differences on a measure of executive attention at the level of preattention, specifically that participants with ASD were not faster than NT, is inconsistent with previous findings of faster visual search times in participants with ASD than in those with NT (Joseph, Keehn, Connolly, Wolfe, & Horowitz, 2009;Kemner, van Ewijk, van Engeland, & Hooge, 2008;O'Riordan, 2000;, though some previous research has failed to find faster feature search times in children with ASD (Plaisted et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, there is mixed evidence for difficulty with task switching on another measure of set shifting, the Intradimensional/Extradimensional Shift Test, with some studies finding impaired performance in ASD (Ozonoff et al, 2004;Yerys et al, 2009) and others finding no impairment (Corbett, Constantine, Hendren, Rocke, & Ozonoff, 2009;Happé, Booth, Charlton, & Hughes, 2006). Other modified measures of set shifting have not found evidence for set-shifting deficits in ASD (Dichter et al, 2010;Poljac et al, 2010). Particularly notable is a finding that performance on a modified set-shifting task in preschoolage children with ASD was not impaired, but was also not correlated with joint attention skills as it was in neurotypical (NT) controls (Stahl & Pry, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two more tools have been used in the form of the DCCS and Set-Shifting tasks, confirming previous results, in which children with ASD performed significantly worse than TD children (Pellicano et al, 2006;Dichter et al, 2010;Pellicano, 2010a).…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitysupporting
confidence: 83%