2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Cinta Senese pigs and their crosses with Large White. 1 Muscle and subcutaneous fat characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

31
52
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
31
52
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, CS showed the thickest backfat at all the locations, consistent with the highest carcass fatness as showed by their composition in fat and lean cuts. The result confirms the well known higher adipogenetic ability of the unimproved breeds (Labroue et al, 2000;Franci et al, 2003Franci et al, , 2005Renaudeau et al, 2005Renaudeau et al, , 2007Serrano et al, 2008) and it was expected since the genetic selection in pigs led to the increase of growth rate and to the reduction of body fat, as observed by Wood et al (2004) comparing modern breeds (Duroc and Large White) with the traditional ones (Berkshire and Tamworth).…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, CS showed the thickest backfat at all the locations, consistent with the highest carcass fatness as showed by their composition in fat and lean cuts. The result confirms the well known higher adipogenetic ability of the unimproved breeds (Labroue et al, 2000;Franci et al, 2003Franci et al, , 2005Renaudeau et al, 2005Renaudeau et al, , 2007Serrano et al, 2008) and it was expected since the genetic selection in pigs led to the increase of growth rate and to the reduction of body fat, as observed by Wood et al (2004) comparing modern breeds (Duroc and Large White) with the traditional ones (Berkshire and Tamworth).…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The crossbreeding could counterbalance some limits of Cinta Senese (CS) both on vita performances and on carcass traits. Crosses between CS and Large White (LW) were historically produced in the Tuscany Region (Raimondi, 1954) and recent studies have been conducted on this crossbred (Acciaioli et al, 2002;Franci et al, 2003Franci et al, , 2005, while no information are available concerning the use of Duroc as sire breed on Cinta Senese.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, significant differences (P<0.05) were detectable among genetic groups with regard to loin eye depth with LW>DU>CT. These findings confirm the general higher fat deposition of native breeds compared to improved pigs (Serra et al, 1998;Franci et al, 2005) and, in addition, they confirm a large amount of variation in the genetic capacity to deposit lean tissue that exists among pigs. Ham percentage did not differ significantly (P>0.05) between the three genetic types, although the hams of the commercial pigs were markedly (P<0.01) heavier (LW= 24.9 kg, DU=23.6 kg) than those of the CT (16.3 kg), because ham weights are related to slaughter weight (Alfonso et al, 2005).…”
Section: Growth and Slaughter Performancesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As expected, CT were fatter than DU and LW pigs, both for backfat thickness and fatty cut yield (P<0.05), while LW and DU pigs had higher (P<0.05) lean meat, and shoulder, loin and neck percentages, as well as lean cut yield and lean cuts/fatty cuts ratio. Comparable measurements for backfat thickness were found by Fortina et al (2005) and Pietrolà et al (2006) on CT pigs and by Franci et al (2005) on Cinta Senese pigs, slaughtered at different ages and weights. Moreover, significant differences (P<0.05) were detectable among genetic groups with regard to loin eye depth with LW>DU>CT.…”
Section: Growth and Slaughter Performancementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation