Second IFIP International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, 2005. WOCN 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/wocn.2005.1436001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of coherent and non-coherent receivers of UWB communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to ar n in (12), br n has Gaussian distribution with zero-mean and variance 2 recb σ that is given by…”
Section: Branch Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to ar n in (12), br n has Gaussian distribution with zero-mean and variance 2 recb σ that is given by…”
Section: Branch Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The randomness of the used PN code sequences with the existence of more than one active-user concurrently in the system permits the approximation of MAI terms, am n in (11) and bm n in (19) as Gaussian random processes [12]. Therefore, the variable statistic a α can be expressed as n n n = × .…”
Section: Error Probability Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coherent schemes correlate the received signal with a well-designed template generated locally or from the received training signal. Typically, one example is Rakereceiver structures [8], but unfortunately, despite their high accuracies, they are not suited for low-complexity and low-power applications. Because of the capturing enough signal energy from the large number of paths and the computational load from estimating the gains and delays of the paths, the acquisition time is especially long and the implementation is very complex [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the non-coherent reception can be implemented with low complexity, because strict channel estimation is not required. The energy detection is one of the non-coherent detection schemes with low complexity [3]. However, the energy detection system has expense of some performance degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%