1993
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600073561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of conventional and alternative cropping systems in cryoboreal subhumid central Alberta

Abstract: A 3-year field study was conducted in central Alberta to discover how diverse soil-plant systems function under cryoboreal subhumid conditions. Barley, fescue, faba (field) bean and a barley/field pea intercrop were grown continuously on different soils at Ellerslie and Breton using two distinct tillage methods. The agronomic performance, weed-crop interactions and below-ground productivity of these cropping systems were examined. The main findings were as follows: different soil properties did not affect yie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Saskatchewan, Canada, where sampling was done to depths of 60 cm (23.6 in), Campbell et al (1977) reported values of 0.14 for SW, and Gan et al (2009) reported values of 0.24 for canola and 0.16 for wheat. In central Alberta, Canada, Izaurralde et al (1993) reported ratios of 0.12 for spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) sampled to a depth of 40 cm (15.7 in), similar to the values we report for SW. Our values for small grain, oil seed, or pulse crops are all considerably smaller than those of Buyanovsky and Wagner (1986) who reported a root:shoot ratio of 0.88 for WW in Missouri in a 50 cm (19.7 in) soil depth, with 75% of the mass within 10 cm (3.9 in) of the soil surface. Wheat root:shoot ratios as low as 0.1 in the surface 10 cm (3.9 in) have been reported under conditions of adequate soil water and Table 5 Phenologic development of root and crown mass for cereal grains and belowground stem and root mass for the 0 to 10 cm soil depth for all crops in 1993 and 1994 near Pendleton, Oregon.…”
Section: Experiments Namesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In Saskatchewan, Canada, where sampling was done to depths of 60 cm (23.6 in), Campbell et al (1977) reported values of 0.14 for SW, and Gan et al (2009) reported values of 0.24 for canola and 0.16 for wheat. In central Alberta, Canada, Izaurralde et al (1993) reported ratios of 0.12 for spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) sampled to a depth of 40 cm (15.7 in), similar to the values we report for SW. Our values for small grain, oil seed, or pulse crops are all considerably smaller than those of Buyanovsky and Wagner (1986) who reported a root:shoot ratio of 0.88 for WW in Missouri in a 50 cm (19.7 in) soil depth, with 75% of the mass within 10 cm (3.9 in) of the soil surface. Wheat root:shoot ratios as low as 0.1 in the surface 10 cm (3.9 in) have been reported under conditions of adequate soil water and Table 5 Phenologic development of root and crown mass for cereal grains and belowground stem and root mass for the 0 to 10 cm soil depth for all crops in 1993 and 1994 near Pendleton, Oregon.…”
Section: Experiments Namesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the lowest S:R ratios measured in the present study was found for oat and not for barley as noted by Bolinder et al (1997). On a Gray Luvisol of Central Alberta, Canada, Izaurralde et al (1993) reported a S:R ratio of 4.0 (roots samples to 40-cm depth) for barley. In Sweden, Paustian et al (1990) estimated the S:R ratio for fertilized and unfertilized barley at peak standing crop to be 3.8 and 5.9, respectively, and in the United Kingdom the S:R ratio for fertilized and unfertilized oat was determined to be 4.4 and 7.7, respectively (Welbank et al 1974).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In research conducted in north-central Alberta, berseem out-performed six other clovers in yield and ability to compete with weeds (Ross et al 2001). Increasing the use of annual legumes in cereal cropping systems, as monocrops or intercrops, could improve sustainability through biological nitrogen fixation, reduction in weed competition and increased input to soil organic matter (Izaurralde et al 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%