1965
DOI: 10.3758/bf03343291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of deaf and hearing children on a short term memory task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that deaf children who maintain expected school progress score about average on the coding subtest while deaf children with language learning difficulties score considerably lower. Other investigations have shown: that deaf children usually perform less well than normally hearing children on tasks which require sequential processing of infonna tion (Withrow, 1968;Hartman & Elliott, 1965); that they do not process information as rapidly as nomlal children (Hartung, 1968;Elliott, Hirsh, & Simmons, 1967;Olssen, 1967); that the patterning of their reading skills differs from that of normals (Elliott & Vegely, 1967; and that they have uneven patterns of subtest scores on standardized intelltgence tests (Elliott, 1967). Since it is not known whether these effects should be attributed to features of the general background of these deaf children, or whether they represent inherent impairments in information processing.…”
Section: /0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that deaf children who maintain expected school progress score about average on the coding subtest while deaf children with language learning difficulties score considerably lower. Other investigations have shown: that deaf children usually perform less well than normally hearing children on tasks which require sequential processing of infonna tion (Withrow, 1968;Hartman & Elliott, 1965); that they do not process information as rapidly as nomlal children (Hartung, 1968;Elliott, Hirsh, & Simmons, 1967;Olssen, 1967); that the patterning of their reading skills differs from that of normals (Elliott & Vegely, 1967; and that they have uneven patterns of subtest scores on standardized intelltgence tests (Elliott, 1967). Since it is not known whether these effects should be attributed to features of the general background of these deaf children, or whether they represent inherent impairments in information processing.…”
Section: /0mentioning
confidence: 99%