2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007jd009403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of DEMETER calibration for rainfall forecasting purposes: Application to the July–August Sahelian rainfall

Abstract: [1] This work assesses and compares the skill of direct and model-output-statistics (MOS) calibrated hindcasts of the July-August rainfall amounts for the dry period 1980-2000 over the Sahel issued from the Development of a European Multimodel Ensemble System for Seasonal to Interannual Prediction (DEMETER) experiment, with the aim to highlight among the simulated parameters, i.e., those potentially relevant for rainfall forecasts purposes. Three approaches were used: the DEMETER (1) direct rainfall, (2) MOS-c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore evaluated for each station using an analysis of variance following Rowell et al (1995), Rowell (1998), Bouali et al (2008), and Philippon et al (2010), among others. The observed total variance of onset dates for each station across the 41 years and 56 combinations is partitioned into the interannual (or external) variance of the mean of the onset dates computed from the whole set of the 56 combinations and the internal variance due to the deviations of each combination relative to the mean.…”
Section: B Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore evaluated for each station using an analysis of variance following Rowell et al (1995), Rowell (1998), Bouali et al (2008), and Philippon et al (2010), among others. The observed total variance of onset dates for each station across the 41 years and 56 combinations is partitioned into the interannual (or external) variance of the mean of the onset dates computed from the whole set of the 56 combinations and the internal variance due to the deviations of each combination relative to the mean.…”
Section: B Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, GCM precipitation outputs are not used for prediction of monsoon onset dates without further analysis of other fields, such as circulation patterns. Quantitative precipitation seasonal forecasts show little skill when compared to persistence or climatology and extracting useful information from such forecasts often requires elaborate post-processing methods such as statistical adaptation (Garric et al, 2002;Bouali et al, 2008). These research efforts were led as a consequence of poor seasonal precipitation forecasting skills in past ensemble forecast experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main reasons for such a choice. Firstly, the interannual variability of rainfall over West Africa is usually inaccurately reproduced or predicted by atmospheric (Moron, 1994) and coupled (Bouali et al, 2008) GCMs that better simulate the decadal variability (Giannini et al, 2003;Hoerling et al, 2006). Secondly, Bare soils the 1-month time lag that exists between rainfall and NDVI is not sufficient for using observed rainfall (or atmospheric dynamics) in operational forecasting, given the frequency of the data updates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%