2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have cardiac sarcoidosis: Is it time to regroup?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study compared three main diagnostic criteria with a conclusion of low concordance between the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) criteria and the other two criteria (WASOG and HRS), raising questions about the specificity of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in the absence of a confirmatory biopsy. Compared with the JMHW criteria, HRS criteria are thought to have greater sensitivity because these criteria include cardiac PET, PET, and MRI, as well as responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy [ 2 , 4 - 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study compared three main diagnostic criteria with a conclusion of low concordance between the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) criteria and the other two criteria (WASOG and HRS), raising questions about the specificity of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in the absence of a confirmatory biopsy. Compared with the JMHW criteria, HRS criteria are thought to have greater sensitivity because these criteria include cardiac PET, PET, and MRI, as well as responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy [ 2 , 4 - 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diagnosis CS without histologic evidence came into question in a study that found low concordance between JCS and other major diagnostic tools for CS. [9]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three available algorithms, including the new version of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (2016) [ 37 ], which help in assessing the diagnosis probability of cardiac sarcoidosis [ 17 , 38 ]. However, when their conclusions disagree, this calls for a multidisciplinary discussion with a cardiologist and specialists in cardiac imaging for a final diagnosis (including ruling out cardiac sarcoidosis and considering an alternative diagnosis) and treatment strategy adapted to every patient [ 39 ]. Differential diagnoses include coronary diseases, giant cell myocarditis, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis [ 3 ].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Extrapulmonary Organ Sarcoidosismentioning
confidence: 99%