Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1082473.1082610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of digital pheromones for swarming vehicle control

Abstract: The use of digital pheromones for controlling and coordinating swarms of unmanned vehicles is studied under various conditions to determine their effectiveness in multiple military scenarios. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of these pheromone algorithms for surveillance, target acquisition, and tracking. The algorithms were demonstrated on hardware platforms and the results from the demonstration are reported

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in infrastructures for military air operations. The digital pheremone infrastructure [23] provides services for injecting and perceiving digital pheromones in different sites of the physical/logical distributed environment, with the inner ability of aggregating, maintaining and diffusing information according to spatial and temporal criteria-this idea is inspired by stigmergy [17], similarly to the work on TOTA co-fields. In the military context these features can be exploited for several purposes such as surveillance and patrol, target acquisition, and target tracking.…”
Section: Digital Pheromone Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in infrastructures for military air operations. The digital pheremone infrastructure [23] provides services for injecting and perceiving digital pheromones in different sites of the physical/logical distributed environment, with the inner ability of aggregating, maintaining and diffusing information according to spatial and temporal criteria-this idea is inspired by stigmergy [17], similarly to the work on TOTA co-fields. In the military context these features can be exploited for several purposes such as surveillance and patrol, target acquisition, and target tracking.…”
Section: Digital Pheromone Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing aerial robotic swarms use relative or global positioning information to navigate in their environment using either map-based strategies (Kuiper and NadjmTehrani, 2006;Parunak et al, 2005;Sauter et al, 2005;Elston and Frew, 2008;Flint et al, 2002;Lawrence et al, 2004;Pack and York, 2005;Yang et al, 2005), Reynolds' Flocking (Reynolds, 1987) or Artificial Physics (Spears et al, 2005) approaches (Basu et al, 2004;De Nardi and Holland, 2007;Holland et al, 2005;Kadrovach and Lamont, 2001;Merino et al, 2006), or predefined swarm formations (Vincent and Rubin, 2004). Other researchers have explored the use of artificial evolution to automatically determine position-aware swarm controllers (Gaudiano et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2004;Richards et al, 2005;Soto and Lin, 2005;Wu et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent past, several computational systems using swarming have been developed for different applications including vehicle routing [16], self-repairing formation control for mobile agents [23], adaptive control in overlay networks [3], and for military applications [5,19,21]. Most of these approaches do not address the task selection problem in swarming as a independent issue and use straightforward approaches such as greedy algorithms within a centralized shared memory setting [9,19] that facilitates rapid information exchange between the swarm units. In contrast, in this paper we describe different heuristic-based strategies in a distributed task selection model for swarming.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focus on the task selection mechanism used by the individual swarm units to process the tasks in the environment. Previous researchers [9,19] have addressed this problem using centralized task allocation algorithms where information about tasks are shared between the swarm units using shared memory-based techniques. In contrast, ensuring efficient task selection by the swarm units becomes a challenging problem in a distributed setting because of the dynamic nature of the environment, differences in characteristics of the swarm units and possible inconsistencies in information between the different swarm units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation