As the hands of time wearily move forward the duty of writing the editorial for Construction Materials has again fallen on my desk and it is my pleasure to introduce the papers in this issue. Things are changing at Construction Materials and we recognise that concrete, while a major construction material, is not the only construction material and the emphasis is now on the broader field of construction materials. As a materials engineer, this is indeed heartening, worthwhile and reflects the changing world we live in.The actual materials themselves are also changing and new materials are both rare and destined to be low volume. Instead the major progress is in the area of blends, mixtures and composites of existing materials. These new materials combine the properties of two or more materials to give a new range of properties and to maximise their strengths and minimise their weaknesses. We will see more of these new blends being commercialised in the future as their properties are optimised.Another major change in the world of materials over the past years is the increasing concern for the environment and how our activities affect it. Sustainability (however you define it) is a major topic, and all materials and applications are now being scrutinised for their environmental impact and sustainability credentials. Construction materials are particularly affected because of the large volumes of materials and energy used in their production and use. This is not a problem that will go away and, if anything, will become more important as resources of all types become more valuable and elusive.These two themes, combinations and sustainability, have wideranging implications for construction materials and in some cases they can be combined to provide even more compelling benefits. They are both explored in this issue, which presents a wide variety of papers with something of interest to all who work in the area of construction materials.Opening the issue is a briefing by Hunter (2013) which discusses the standards for asphalt laying in the UK (not the standards of asphalt laying in the UK which is a very different subject). Standards is not the most exciting of subjects but they do define what most of us do and how we do it. Without well written and clear standards the job of being an engineer becomes much more difficult, if not impossible. Good standards give us a common language for discussion and enable us to communicate effectively with one another.Equally, poor standards hinder communication and lead to time being wasted and errors being made as we all try to define and discover what language we are using. Hunter makes an impassioned plea for clarity in current asphalt standards where his experience shows many areas for potential confusion and poor communication. The ability to assess the quality of asphalt laying by reference to a clear and unambiguous standard is essential for the diagnosis of asphalt failures, something which many of us see and feel on a regular basis. He concludes that the current UK standard ne...