2013
DOI: 10.1177/0309364612458686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of elite seated discus throwers in F30s classes

Abstract: This study aimed at improving the understanding of the relationship between performance and the design of the throwing frame of seated discus throwers, with a particular emphasis on the importance of feet positioning. This knowledge is particularly important in the current debate around general principles underlying design of throwing frame and classification of athletes with a disability, including those with lower limb amputation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, it agrees with other recent papers (Abdelkader, Madani, Adel, et al, 2018;R. M. Bartlett, 1992;Frossard et al, 2013b;Leigh et al, 2010) and computational simulations for the kinematic angle values close to this study (Sueyoshi and Maruyama, 1992). On the other hand, these differences in the timing of movement for each athlete indicates the specific characteristics of kinetic performance according to his medical classification and degree, and this causes a discrepancy in the distribution of time along the technical stages of discus throwing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the one hand, it agrees with other recent papers (Abdelkader, Madani, Adel, et al, 2018;R. M. Bartlett, 1992;Frossard et al, 2013b;Leigh et al, 2010) and computational simulations for the kinematic angle values close to this study (Sueyoshi and Maruyama, 1992). On the other hand, these differences in the timing of movement for each athlete indicates the specific characteristics of kinetic performance according to his medical classification and degree, and this causes a discrepancy in the distribution of time along the technical stages of discus throwing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In another study, it is put forward that the optimum height of release is 90% of thrower's height [ 22 ], while Bartlett think that 93% of thrower's height is the best release height. Of course, in addition to technical parameters, there are anthropometric indicators such as athlete's height and arm length of athletes [ 1 ]; other studies also indicate that the height of release is important to performance of discus throwing [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only several experiments studied the individual technique of competitive exercises. These experiments assessed the biomechanical parameters of implementation of different physical actions during the competitive activity of athletes [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%