2018
DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n5p301-307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of explicit approximations of the coefficient of head loss for pressurized conduits

Abstract: A B S T R A C TOne of the parameters involved in the design of pressurized hydraulic systems is the pressure drop in the pipes. The verification of the pressure drop can be performed through the Darcy-Weisbach formulation, which considers a coefficient of head loss (f) that can be estimated by the implicit Colebrook-White equation. However, for this determination, it is necessary to use numerical methods or the Moody diagram. Because of this, numerous explicit approaches have been proposed to overcome such lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the models proposed are explicit, i.e., they allow to estimate values for the friction factor directly as a function of both, the Reynolds number and the relative roughness of the pipe conducting the flow. Some good reviews on this particular subject matter are also available in the literature …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the models proposed are explicit, i.e., they allow to estimate values for the friction factor directly as a function of both, the Reynolds number and the relative roughness of the pipe conducting the flow. Some good reviews on this particular subject matter are also available in the literature …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabela 1. Critério para interpretação do Índice de Concordância, do Coeficiente de Correlação e do Índice de Desempenho e suas respectivas classificações Pimenta et al (2018)…”
unclassified
“…Unfortunately, in our case using the input parameters in their raw form the accuracy was not at a high level without acceleration, so having previous experience with the same problem where we used Artificial Neural Network [15,16] to simulate results, we normalized parameters a=log10(Re), b=-log10(ε/D), in order to avoid discrepancy in the scale which are in raw form 1000<Re<10 8 and ε/D<<1 and after normalization 3.5<a<8 and 1.3<b<6.5 (Eureqa, software used a as genetic programming tool also suggested to us a data normalization process) [34][35][36]. The normalization gives relatively good results, and genetic programming tool generated more accurate results without knowing that the logarithmic form of the Colebrook equation was originally used but only knowing the predicted input and output datasets; Figure 3: Using our previous experience [15] with the training of the Artificial Neural Network where very good results were achieved through the normalization of parameters; a=log10(Re), b=-log10(ε/D), the genetic programming tool generated a dozen equations with different levels of accuracy and complexity, but fortunately none of them contain logarithms or non-integer power terms.…”
Section: Normalized Input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main idea is to use already computed parameter b=-log10(ε/D) and to use Padé polynomial in from ln(1-θ), where θ is given by Eq. (8). In Eq.…”
Section: Possible Simplificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%