2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of field-aged polymeric spray lining for water pipe rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spray repair, in contrast to traditional excavation methods, presents the advantages of reduced overall costs, shorter construction durations, and minimal environmental impact, rendering it a widely favored approach for pipeline restoration. [7][8][9] During the spray repair process for underground water supply pipelines, it is imperative to ensure that the sprayed material can rapidly solidify, ensuring adequate bonding strength and close adhesion to the inner pipeline wall. Furthermore, the material must meet the long-term operational demands of the pipeline in terms of fundamental mechanical properties and corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spray repair, in contrast to traditional excavation methods, presents the advantages of reduced overall costs, shorter construction durations, and minimal environmental impact, rendering it a widely favored approach for pipeline restoration. [7][8][9] During the spray repair process for underground water supply pipelines, it is imperative to ensure that the sprayed material can rapidly solidify, ensuring adequate bonding strength and close adhesion to the inner pipeline wall. Furthermore, the material must meet the long-term operational demands of the pipeline in terms of fundamental mechanical properties and corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the repair of deteriorating and aging water supply pipelines becomes imperative. Spray repair, in contrast to traditional excavation methods, presents the advantages of reduced overall costs, shorter construction durations, and minimal environmental impact, rendering it a widely favored approach for pipeline restoration 7–9 . During the spray repair process for underground water supply pipelines, it is imperative to ensure that the sprayed material can rapidly solidify, ensuring adequate bonding strength and close adhesion to the inner pipeline wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the grouting void reduces the pressure capacity and should be avoided in engineering practice. Azoor et al 21 presented results from a test intended to evaluate the performance of actual inservice, spray-lined pipes extracted from the field. The material property of the liner was tested, and the results found that the repaired pipes were able to withstand operational pressures with circular through-wall holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the grouting void reduces the pressure capacity and should be avoided in engineering practice. Azoor et al 21 . presented results from a test intended to evaluate the performance of actual in‐service, spray‐lined pipes extracted from the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exacerbated by ageing assets and hence timely monitoring of them is essential for identifying faults and determining the most effective ways of renewal [4]. CIPP (Cured in Place Pipe) [5] or spray techniques [6] are widely utilized in the "lining" process, which is a popular form of renewal. Despite the fact that a variety of robotic technologies are available for the condition assessment of host pipes [7], [8], they do not provide critical information about the quality of the liners and their long-term performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%