2019
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of FRAX in Women with Breast Cancer Initiating Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: A Registry-Based Cohort Study

Abstract: FRAX was developed to predict 10‐year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture in the general population. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) used in breast cancer induce loss in bone mineral density (BMD) and are reported to increase fracture risk. AI exposure is not a direct input to FRAX but is captured under “secondary osteoporosis”. To inform use of FRAX in women treated with AI, we used a population‐based registry for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, to identify women aged ≥40 years initi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, inconsistent findings regarding the performance of FRAX without BMD was reported in several other studies. Leslie et al observed that the fracture probability estimated without BMD overestimate risk among the general population [36], which is consistent with findings from the present study. Other studies have reported underestimation of fracture risk by FRAX [12,37,38], but their methodologies have lately been found to be problematic because they either compared incidence with probabilities or failed to take the competing mortality risk into account [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, inconsistent findings regarding the performance of FRAX without BMD was reported in several other studies. Leslie et al observed that the fracture probability estimated without BMD overestimate risk among the general population [36], which is consistent with findings from the present study. Other studies have reported underestimation of fracture risk by FRAX [12,37,38], but their methodologies have lately been found to be problematic because they either compared incidence with probabilities or failed to take the competing mortality risk into account [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the registry study, the designation of “secondary osteoporosis” as a risk factor for AI-induced bone loss overestimates fracture risks [ 67 ]. In multivariate analysis, women with breast cancer initiating AI-therapy had higher body mass index, higher BMD, lower osteoporosis prevalence, and fewer prior fractures than women not starting AIs or the healthy population [ 68 ]. The implications being AIs do not cause as many fractures as previously thought.…”
Section: Determining Fracture Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) is used to estimate the risk of osteoporotic fracture using femoral neck BMD and clinical risk factors, which include age, prior nontraumatic fracture, glucocorticoid use, low body mass index, family history of osteoporosis, smoking, and excess alcohol intake, which are also associated with incidence of fracture. However, FRAX is not designed to estimate the risk of AI-related fracture, and the estimated fracture risk by FRAX tends to be lower than that of the actual fracture incidence in breast cancer patients receiving AI [19]. Thus, the evaluation of other risk factors is warranted to determine appropriate administration of BMA to prevent AI-related fracture in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%