2008
DOI: 10.2478/cmam-2008-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Of H-Lu Preconditioning For Sparse Matrices

Abstract: In this paper we review the technique of hierarchical matrices and put it into the context of black-box solvers for large linear systems. Numerical examples for several classes of problems from medium to large scale illustrate the applicability and efficiency of this technique. We compare the results with those of several direct solvers (which typically scale quadratically in the matrix size) as well as an iterative solver (an algebraic multigrid method) which scales linearly (if it converges in O(1) steps).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, numerical evidence indicates their great usefulness for example, for black box preconditioning in iterative solvers, [Beb05,Gra05,GHK08,LBG06,GKLB08].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, numerical evidence indicates their great usefulness for example, for black box preconditioning in iterative solvers, [Beb05,Gra05,GHK08,LBG06,GKLB08].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance, as well as a comparison of H-LU with some sparse direct solvers is presented in [3]. Kriemann [4] and Lizé [5] implemented this algorithm using Directed Acyclic Graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception is the work by Grasedyck et al [32], where their H-LU preconditioner is compared with BoomerAMG, Pardiso, MUMPS, UMFPACK, SuperLU, and Spooles. However, their executions are serial, and show that their H-matrix code is not yet competitive with these other highly optimized libraries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%