2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of lab-scale filtration system for grey water treatment and reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process reduced the pH by 26%, the decrease may be due to chemical reactions influenced by a functional group of any filtration medium. Additionally, during adsorption (Vader Waal forces of attraction) there is the possibility of cations and anions being released into the system, keeping pH in the range (Tusiime et al, 2022). The values obtained are in agreement with results reported before, which adsorption occurs in pH range of 6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The process reduced the pH by 26%, the decrease may be due to chemical reactions influenced by a functional group of any filtration medium. Additionally, during adsorption (Vader Waal forces of attraction) there is the possibility of cations and anions being released into the system, keeping pH in the range (Tusiime et al, 2022). The values obtained are in agreement with results reported before, which adsorption occurs in pH range of 6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The process reduced the pH by 26%, the decrease may be due to chemical reactions influenced by a functional group of any filtration medium. Additionally, during adsorption (Vader Waal forces of attraction) there is the possibility of cations and anions being released into the system, keeping pH in the range (Tusiime et al, 2022). The values obtained are in agreement with results reported before, which adsorption occurs in pH range of 6.5-8 (Christova-Boal et al, 1996;Fernando et al, 2009;Finley et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We have attained a 94% BOD5 removal efficiency with aeration and media filtration at a HLR of 10 m/h and 98% at 60 m/h (Table 6). These results are in line with those reported by [30], where they achieved BOD removal rates of 98.8%, 99.5%, and 98.9% using sand and charcoal media at hydraulic retention times of 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h, respectively.…”
Section: Cod and Bod5supporting
confidence: 92%
“…With media filtration we obtained 80.3% and 63.5% removal efficiency of BOD5 and COD (Table 6). We achieved 93% BOD5 removal at HLR 10 m/h and 96% at 60 m/h by aeration and sand media (Table 6), similar to [30] findings of 96.5%, 99.1%, and 96.8% BOD5 removal using sand media at different retention times. However, it is important to note that their influent BOD5 was 1.6 times lower than our raw water BOD5.…”
Section: Cod and Bod5supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation