2017
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/54/1/012098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of LAPAN-A2 satellite data to classify land cover/land use in Semarang, Central Java

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall performance of objectbased classification on LAPAN-A2 on extracting LC/LU information was lower than pixel-based classification or visual interpretation previously done by Nugroho et al (2017) with 61.77% accuracy. This result indicates that interpretability of LAPAN-A2 data is around 62%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall performance of objectbased classification on LAPAN-A2 on extracting LC/LU information was lower than pixel-based classification or visual interpretation previously done by Nugroho et al (2017) with 61.77% accuracy. This result indicates that interpretability of LAPAN-A2 data is around 62%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Figure 3-2 and 3-3 further show that a relatively homogenous water body (indicates by green rectangle on Figure 3-3) tends to have a high variation of digital number on LAPAN-A2 data compared with Pleiades-1A data. Performing smoothing algorithm prior to segmentation and classification process might be able to reduce this effect.Overall performance of objectbased classification on LAPAN-A2 on extracting LC/LU information was lower than pixel-based classification or visual interpretation previously done by Nugroho et al (2017) with 61.77% accuracy. This result indicates that interpretability of LAPAN-A2 data is around 62%.…”
contrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LAPAN-A3 data is expected to be complementary to Landsat-8 data as well as medium resolution data from other operational satellites. A previous study of LAPAN-A2 shows that the accuracy obtained in the identification of urban land cover (case study of Semarang, Central Java) when the satellite is in offnadir position reaches more than 60%, both using visual interpretation (Nugroho et al 2017a) or digital classification (Nugroho et al 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%