2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Mapping Approaches for Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing Data in Crop Plants

Abstract: allowed mismatches had a strong impact and leads to differences of the performance of the eight read mappers. In conclusion, we recommend BSMAP which needs the shortest run time and yields the highest precision, and Bismark which requires the smallest amount of memory and yields precision and high numbers of uniquely mapped reads.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the skin microbiome, 85.89%, 85.35% and 54.9% of reads were mapped for RIMS-seq, DNA-seq and bisulfite-seq respectively. The low mapping rate for bisulfite-seq is a known challenge as the reduction of the alphabet to A, G, T generates ambiguous mapping ( 24 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the skin microbiome, 85.89%, 85.35% and 54.9% of reads were mapped for RIMS-seq, DNA-seq and bisulfite-seq respectively. The low mapping rate for bisulfite-seq is a known challenge as the reduction of the alphabet to A, G, T generates ambiguous mapping ( 24 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the skin microbiome, 85.89%, 85.35% and 54.9% of reads were mapped for RIMS-seq, DNA-seq and bisulfite-seq respectively. The low mapping rate for bisulfite-seq is a known challenge as the reduction of the alphabet to A, G, T generates ambiguous mapping (Grehl et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step was the alignment of the WGBS reads on the latest available genome sequence ( ) [ 3 ] by using BISMARK (version 0.16.3, [ 77 ] and Bowtie 2 tools (version 2.1.0; [ 78 ]). Due to sequenced genome quality (2090 scaffolds in version 2, N residues in intergenic sequences), BSMAP version 2.74 [ 79 , 80 ] was used to measure DNA methylation levels at each cytosine site on a reduced representation consisting on gene models (34,363) including 5 Kbp flanking regions. All data were processed in R [ 81 ].…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%