Performance of Masonry Buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake

Decanini, Luis D.; Sortis, A. De; Goretti, A.; Langenbach, Randolph; Mollaioli, Fabrizio; Rasulo, Alessandro

doi:10.1193/1.1765106

Cited by 77 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Genellikle, yığma duvarlar kesmeden ötürü dayanımlarını yitirmeye başladıkları anda kil tuğlaların ezildikleri saptanmıştır. Yığma malzemeler arasındaki birleşimdeki bu kayıp, çatlakların başlamasını takiben göçmeye yol açabilmektedir [19]. Şekil-7'de delikli kil tuğla elemanlar kullanılmış ve eksik harç ile imal edilmiş duvarlarda oluşan deprem hasarları gösterilmiştir.…”

Section: Delikli Kil Tuğla Kullanımıunclassified

2011 Van depremlerinden sonra yığma yapılarda gözlemlenen hasarlar

Oyguç¹

2017

Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Delikli Kil Tuğla Kullanımıunclassified

2011 Van depremlerinden sonra yığma yapılarda gözlemlenen hasarlar

Oyguç¹

2017

Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While incorporating countermeasures against several risks and their impacts, vernacular technologies are developed and found across the world. The performance of Dhajji-dewari, Nias, Himis, LambanTuha, Pombalino, Newari Chhen, Casa Baracada, Bhungas, Batak, Lombok, Tasikmalaya, among others during past events has proven the efficacy of vernacular houses (Boen 2001;Decanini et al 2004;Gulkan and Langenbach 2004;Bothara et al 2007;Winarno et al 2008;Amirrol 2010;Gautam 2014, Ortega et al 2015Gautam and Rodrigues 2015). In this regard cultural aspects and local resource led economic and appropriate constructions are incorporated in most of the indigenous settlements.…”

Section: Future Insightmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disaster resilient vernacular housing technology in Nepal

Gautam¹,

Prajapati

Paterno

et al. 2016

Geoenviron Disasters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Disasters like earthquakes and flood cause enormous loss of lives and property in Nepal frequently. However, during such events particular types of houses are found to be more resilient than common types of housing stocks. This paper outlines the disaster resilient vernacular housing technologies in two of the physiographic regions of Nepal. The vernacular houses are analyzed in terms of their performance and shortcomings during earthquake and flood disasters and found to be technologically resilient in many aspects of impending disasters in Nepal distributed within the physiographic regions. Using the comparative case study approach, field visits and non-structured interviews with local people, the resilient features in terms of construction technology of vernacular houses are identified in this study and the preliminary findings are highlighted as observed during the field visits without numerical modeling and analysis. The seismic performance of Rajbanshi, Gurung and Magar houses in Nepal during 1934Nepal during , 1988Nepal during and 2015 earthquakes is presented in order to justify the performance of these particular housing stocks. Results: The vernacular construction technology in Terai is found to be technologically resilient in terms of floods and earthquakes, and earthquake resistant technologies are identified in the dwellings of the western mid-hill of Nepal. The traditional Rajbanshi houses in eastern Nepal are found to be resilient in terms of earthquake and flood disasters and the Gurung and Magar houses in western mid hills are found to be resilient in terms of earthquake disaster. The statistical distribution of housing stocks is presented and survival scenario is discussed with regard to specific building features. Apart from this, the field reconnaissance after Gorkha earthquake in western Nepal shows better performance of buildings with identified features in comparison to common housing stocks in neighborhoods.

show abstract

“…In the past research (Decanini et al, 2004;Nuti et al, 2007;Nuti et al, 2010) [4,14,16] a combination of the aforementioned measures was used for the seismic assessment of networks, on the basis of a judgmental choice of which one was the best in the case at study. The choice, in this study, to use the peak ground velocity, PGV as main parameter for the representation of the seismic action at site will be commented in the next section, since this topic is strictly related with damage representation.…”

Section: Model Of Seismic Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%