2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of mesophilic biohydrogen-producing cultures at thermophilic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Holwerda and Lynd (2013) found that the best fit to their results on C. thermocellum was with a substrate utilization rate that is both first order with respect to substrate and first order in cells. Recently, Gupta et al (2015) found a µ max of 0.05 d −1 on cellulose using mesophilic anaerobic digested sludge (ADS) and a Ks of 2.1 g l −1 , which is four times lower than that achieved by C. termitidis in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…For example, Holwerda and Lynd (2013) found that the best fit to their results on C. thermocellum was with a substrate utilization rate that is both first order with respect to substrate and first order in cells. Recently, Gupta et al (2015) found a µ max of 0.05 d −1 on cellulose using mesophilic anaerobic digested sludge (ADS) and a Ks of 2.1 g l −1 , which is four times lower than that achieved by C. termitidis in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The reliability of these data was demonstrated by the fact that COD balance was maintained at 90% during dark fermentation. 29 At the end of dark fermentation for bioH 2 production, the final pH dropped to 4.8−5.0 in all reactors. This small change in pH provided opportunities for bioH 2 production bacteria to acclimate to the new environment, had few suppressive effects on the microorganisms, and did not limit bioH 2 production in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Its lag time range for fermentation was 5.98–6.48 h. However, there was an adaptation phase for the microorganisms as the HA concentration increased, and there was no significant change in the lag time of the dark fermentation bioH 2 production system. The reliability of these data was demonstrated by the fact that COD balance was maintained at 90% during dark fermentation . At the end of dark fermentation for bioH 2 production, the final pH dropped to 4.8–5.0 in all reactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental design was organised as a 2 × 3 (2 times 3) factorial and examined the main effects and interaction of two factors (incubation temperature, 35 °C or 55 °C, quantitative factor, and diaper conditioning, qualitative or categorical factor) on H 2 production in the batch fermentation of used (waste) disposable diapers (Montgomery, 2012). Temperatures 35 °C and 55 °C were chosen based on this rationale: Typical optimal ranges for anaerobic fermentations are mesophilic (34 °C–37 °C) and thermophilic (52 °C–57 °C) (see Gupta et al, 2015; Valdez-Vázquez and Poggi-Varaldo, 2009a for temperature effects on anaerobic H 2 fermentations). Intermediate temperatures (such as 45 °C Fair and Moore, 1937; Fair et al, 1968) as well as lower temperatures, generally give lower results (Fair et al, 1968; Madigan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%