2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of models for the beginning of sweet cherry blossom under current and changed climate conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is decreasing winter chilling (Cook, Wolkovich, & Parmesan, 2012;Fu, Zhao et al, 2015;Xie, Ahmed, Allen, Wilson, & Silander, 2015;Yu, Luedeling, & Xu, 2010), since insufficient chilling of buds during the winter can inhibit the genetic and physiological re-programming needed for dormancy release. The photoperiod may also limit phenological responses to temperature in some species: if buds ontogenesis starts earlier in spring, the shorter day length can slow down bud development or reduce its responsiveness to temperature (Basler & K€ orner, 2012(Basler & K€ orner, , 2014Bl€ umel & Chmielewski, 2012;Caffarra & Donnelly, 2011;Chmielewski & G€ otz, 2016). The photoperiod may also limit phenological responses to temperature in some species: if buds ontogenesis starts earlier in spring, the shorter day length can slow down bud development or reduce its responsiveness to temperature (Basler & K€ orner, 2012(Basler & K€ orner, , 2014Bl€ umel & Chmielewski, 2012;Caffarra & Donnelly, 2011;Chmielewski & G€ otz, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is decreasing winter chilling (Cook, Wolkovich, & Parmesan, 2012;Fu, Zhao et al, 2015;Xie, Ahmed, Allen, Wilson, & Silander, 2015;Yu, Luedeling, & Xu, 2010), since insufficient chilling of buds during the winter can inhibit the genetic and physiological re-programming needed for dormancy release. The photoperiod may also limit phenological responses to temperature in some species: if buds ontogenesis starts earlier in spring, the shorter day length can slow down bud development or reduce its responsiveness to temperature (Basler & K€ orner, 2012(Basler & K€ orner, , 2014Bl€ umel & Chmielewski, 2012;Caffarra & Donnelly, 2011;Chmielewski & G€ otz, 2016). The photoperiod may also limit phenological responses to temperature in some species: if buds ontogenesis starts earlier in spring, the shorter day length can slow down bud development or reduce its responsiveness to temperature (Basler & K€ orner, 2012(Basler & K€ orner, , 2014Bl€ umel & Chmielewski, 2012;Caffarra & Donnelly, 2011;Chmielewski & G€ otz, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photothermal-time approach, suggested by Blümel and Chmielewski [13], did successfully regulate the accumulation of forcing temperatures during the long ecodormancy phase and lead to much more realistic model parameters for C*, t 1 , T BF (base temperature for forcing accumulation) and F* (forcing requirement) [14,34,37]. However, some species do not show any photoperiodicity during ecodormancy [16,32].…”
Section: Relevance For Phenological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This must lead to an overestimation of C*. Surprisingly, the consideration of photoperiodicity during ecodormancy led to better model results [38,39] and mainly to more realistic dates for t 1 and C* [14,34,37]. Experimental studies showed that some late successional species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations