2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:5(392)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Neural Networks in Daily Streamflow Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural technologies continue to make enormous strides in their struggle to become established as recognized tools that offer efficient and effective solutions for modelling and analysing the behaviour of complex dynamical systems. Time series forecasting has been a particular focus of interest and superior performing models have been reported in a diverse set of fields that include rainfall-runoff modelling (ASCE, 2000a, b;Dawson and Wilby, 2001;Birikundavy et al, 2002;Campolo et al, 2003;Huang et al, 2004;Riad et al, 2004;Hettiarachchi et al, 2005;Senthil Kumar et al, 2005) and sediment prediction (Abrahart and White, 2001;Nagy et al, 2002;Yitian and Gu, 2003;Kisi, 2004;Bhattacharya et al, 2005;Kisi, 2005). Moreover, for flood forecasting purposes, neural solutions offer practical advantages related to operational costs and socio-economic resources that would be of interest in developing countries, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural technologies continue to make enormous strides in their struggle to become established as recognized tools that offer efficient and effective solutions for modelling and analysing the behaviour of complex dynamical systems. Time series forecasting has been a particular focus of interest and superior performing models have been reported in a diverse set of fields that include rainfall-runoff modelling (ASCE, 2000a, b;Dawson and Wilby, 2001;Birikundavy et al, 2002;Campolo et al, 2003;Huang et al, 2004;Riad et al, 2004;Hettiarachchi et al, 2005;Senthil Kumar et al, 2005) and sediment prediction (Abrahart and White, 2001;Nagy et al, 2002;Yitian and Gu, 2003;Kisi, 2004;Bhattacharya et al, 2005;Kisi, 2005). Moreover, for flood forecasting purposes, neural solutions offer practical advantages related to operational costs and socio-economic resources that would be of interest in developing countries, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nash-Sutcliffe model evaluation statistic is widely used to validate various models [45][46][47]. The Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency statistic is defined in Equation (5).…”
Section: Water Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time series modeling using ANN has been a particular focus of interest and better performing models have been reported in a diverse set of fields that include rainfall-runoff modeling [8][9][10][11][12] and groundwater level prediction [13][14][15][16]. It is also reported that ANN models are not very satisfied in precision for forecasting because it considered only few aspects of time series property [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%