2012
DOI: 10.33584/jnzg.2012.74.2855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of new dairy pastures

Abstract: It is common practice to renew old and "run-out" pastures that are not performing. Renewing pasture is costly so it is critical that the regrassing pays off. This trial on ten irrigated dairy farms from North Canterbury to North Otago was initiated to determine the value of regrassing on long term production and persistence of the new pastures. A pasture, deemed as run-out by the farmer, was subdivided and one half was renewed to a novel endophyte ryegrass pasture while the remainder of the paddock remained in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from this trial are inconsistent with results from irrigated dairy farms in Canterbury and North Otago, where there was no difference between renewed and unrenewed pastures in DM production (Taylor et al 2012). Two key reasons for the difference between findings of Taylor et al (2012) and those presented here are that firstly, the Waikato/BoP study did not incorporate DM production during the establishment year (which may be much less in the renewed than unrenewed pastures), and secondly, the lack of irrigation in Waikato and BoP pastures. The summer/autumn drought frequently experienced in these northern regions, coupled with high black beetle and other pest populations, contributes to sown species mortality, weed ingress and loss of DM production.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Results from this trial are inconsistent with results from irrigated dairy farms in Canterbury and North Otago, where there was no difference between renewed and unrenewed pastures in DM production (Taylor et al 2012). Two key reasons for the difference between findings of Taylor et al (2012) and those presented here are that firstly, the Waikato/BoP study did not incorporate DM production during the establishment year (which may be much less in the renewed than unrenewed pastures), and secondly, the lack of irrigation in Waikato and BoP pastures. The summer/autumn drought frequently experienced in these northern regions, coupled with high black beetle and other pest populations, contributes to sown species mortality, weed ingress and loss of DM production.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…For the seven pastures where contamination was detected, predicted mean contamination was typically ≤7%, except for one pasture, which averaged 20% of total tillers tested. In this case, the contaminating endophyte was predominantly AR1 (16 out of 18 tillers), in a pasture that was known to have only partial herbicide kill during the pasture renewal process (Taylor et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four pastures had less than 70% infection, the most notable being the Te Teko North Island pasture at 41%. The cause of the <70% infection in one of these South Island pastures is likely a result of the pasture renewal process failing to kill all the endophyte‐free plants from the old pasture as no chemical control was used on this organic farm (Taylor et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations