1995
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1995)121:12(1806)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of New Sandwich Tube under Axial Loading: Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 6,7] tested 26 stub CFDSCT columns with outer tube diameters ranging from 74.7 to 114.3 mm and inner tube diameters ranging from 61.2 to 88.9 mm. The diameter-to-thickness ratio of the outer tubes varied from 43 to 169.…”
Section: Previous Work On Cfdsctsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6,7] tested 26 stub CFDSCT columns with outer tube diameters ranging from 74.7 to 114.3 mm and inner tube diameters ranging from 61.2 to 88.9 mm. The diameter-to-thickness ratio of the outer tubes varied from 43 to 169.…”
Section: Previous Work On Cfdsctsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Eqs. (2) and (3), the load-capacity, experimental and numerical results are compared in Table 3. Compared with the results from the experiment, the average ratio is 0.962 with the mean square deviation of 0.037; while compared with the results from the numerical simulation, the average ratio is 1.065 with the mean square deviation of 0.026.…”
Section: Derivation Of Axial Compression Loadcapacity Formula Of Cfdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of CFDSST short members with the circle section subjected to axial compression are investigated in Refs. [2][3][4][5], and the mechanical properties of CFDSST with circular section which is subjected to axial compression and eccentricity compression and circular CFDSST members subjected to axial compression and bending moment simultaneously can be located in Refs. [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of experimental investigations showed that, for CFDSTs under axial compression, the passive confining pressure induced by steel tubes can effectively enhance the overall axial capacity by up to 30%; also, its failure mode was reported to be primarily decided by the ratio between the steel tube thickness and cross-sectional diameter (Wei et al, 1995, Zhao et al, 2010b. Furthermore, efforts were also put into studying the behaviours of CFDSTs under transverse loading (Han et al, 2006), tensile loading (Li et al, 2014), torsional loading (Huang et al, 2013) as well as fire (Lu et al, 2010), and they all have evidenced that CFDSTs are able to yield excellent performance under a variety of loading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%