2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of photovoltaic canarian greenhouse: A comparison study between summer and winter seasons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the implementation of PV into agricultural settings is through integrating PV modules into the greenhouse's envelope, mainly the roof [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, conventional opaque PV modules produce shade, thereby significantly affecting the microclimate inside the structure (air temperature, relative humidity, level of light and CO 2 concentration) and productivity [42][43][44][45][46]. To minimize this effect, one approach is to use completely opaque PV modules that cover part of the greenhouse roof or PV modules with partial opaque sections that produce electricity (Figure 8a).…”
Section: Current Design Solution and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the implementation of PV into agricultural settings is through integrating PV modules into the greenhouse's envelope, mainly the roof [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, conventional opaque PV modules produce shade, thereby significantly affecting the microclimate inside the structure (air temperature, relative humidity, level of light and CO 2 concentration) and productivity [42][43][44][45][46]. To minimize this effect, one approach is to use completely opaque PV modules that cover part of the greenhouse roof or PV modules with partial opaque sections that produce electricity (Figure 8a).…”
Section: Current Design Solution and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Px, photosynthetically active radiation of crops (kW/m2); η, the effective ratio of photosynthetic radiation, 0.47 on sunny days and 0.5 on cloudy days; μ, unit conversion value of photosynthetic radiation to convert (μmol/m 2 • s) to (w/m 2 ), it is assigned a value of 4.55 in this paper; Kprod, the cumulative coefficient of production, it is assigned a value of 5 in this paper; tresp, response time, it is assigned a value of 3600 s in this paper. The annual income model of AP-PVG is as follows:…”
Section: Annual Income Model Of Ap-pvgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α、γ, light response coefficient; β, correction factor; I, photosynthetically active radiation of crops (μmol/m2 • s); Rd, crop respiration rate (μmol/m 2 • s). In a PVG, the solar radiation of greenhouse crops is distributed as PX (kW/m 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the world's population, together with the deterioration of natural resources and current and future food demands, is one of the frequent problems that receives the most attention within the working agendas of the governmental and non-governmental entities of the nations (Akrami et al, 2020). One of the alternatives of intensification of the agriculture more promoted for the food production is the agriculture under cover, at present it is estimated that for the production of fresh vegetables there are about 3,220,000 has under this type of productive system and of this total approximately 95% of the area are medium and low technology structures, within which one of the most relevant are passive type greenhouse structures, which are used in more than 115 countries worldwide (Baeza et al, 2020;Ezzaeri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%